Rolr3 1920x300
Ankara April 3 High Temp: Can 11°C Hold at 42%?

Ankara April 3 High Temp: Can 11°C Hold at 42%?

SR Sofia Renard Climate & Science Analyst
Market Resolved
Embed this market
Resolution Verdict
NO Market Resolved

Market has ended. Final implied probability: 100%.

Resolved
Volume
$203.6K
$136.2K in 24h
Liquidity
$243.3K
Deep liquidity
Time Left
Ended
Resolves Apr 3
204K Vol. Ended
12°C $35K Vol.
100%
7°C or below $8K Vol.
0%
8°C $6K Vol.
0%
9°C $15K Vol.
0%
10°C $9K Vol.
0%
11°C $26K Vol.
0%

Something moved traders on this contract. The 11°C outcome for Ankara’s April 3 daily maximum climbed 7.5% in 24 hours, with two separate intraday swings on April 2 alone: down 6%, then back up 5.5%. That kind of whipsaw doesn’t happen without competing forecast data hitting the market. The question is which read is correct.

The contract currently prices the 11°C outcome at 42%, with NO sitting at 58%. Resolution happens at 2026-04-03 12:00:00, which means this market closes on the actual measurement date. With $72,504 in total volume and $58,811 of that trading in the last 24 hours, this is an active market for its size. But at $10,060 in available liquidity, a single large bet could reprice this contract sharply before Ankara records its high.

How the Ankara Temperature Contract Works

This is a single-outcome market within a multi-bucket temperature structure. Polymarket has sliced Ankara’s April 3 daily maximum into discrete bands: 7°C or below, 8°C, 9°C, 10°C, 11°C, 12°C, 13°C, 14°C, 15°C, 16°C, and 17°C or higher. Each bucket is its own binary contract. The 11°C contract resolves YES if official measurement confirms 11°C as the day’s high, and NO if any other temperature is recorded.

  • YES: Ankara’s April 3 maximum temperature is officially recorded as 11°C. Price: $0.42. Probability: 42%. Resolves: 2026-04-03 12:00:00.
  • NO: Ankara’s April 3 maximum is any temperature other than 11°C. Price: $0.58. Probability: 58%. Resolves: 2026-04-03 12:00:00.

NO buyers need the thermometer to land anywhere except 11°C. That sounds easy given twelve possible buckets, but temperature forecasts for a single day in early April in central Anatolia tend to cluster tightly. Ankara’s April climate averages around 13-15°C for daily highs, which puts 11°C on the cooler side of normal. A cold air intrusion from the north or persistent cloud cover would support 11°C. A warmer pattern or southerly flow would push the outcome toward higher buckets, and NO wins by default if the high lands at 10°C or below.

Sponsored Partner
ROLRROLR

Momentum and Market Signals

The momentum picture here is compressed and volatile. The 1-hour and 24-hour signals both point upward after a chaotic April 2, where the price dropped and then recovered within the same session. That pattern suggests two rounds of forecast data hit traders in sequence: one showing a warmer outlook (price fell), one correcting back toward 11°C (price recovered). The net result is a 7.5% gain on the day, but the path there was not a clean directional move.

Total volume of $72,504 with $58,811 trading in 24 hours signals genuine short-term conviction. However, $10,060 in liquidity is thin. Any single trader placing a few thousand dollars into this contract will move the price measurably. The market is pricing uncertainty, not science. Here’s what the measurements are telling us: numerical weather models disagree on Ankara’s April 3 high by a margin wide enough to span two or three temperature buckets.

  • 24-hour price change: Up 7.5%, driven by competing forecast revisions on April 2 that resolved net-positive for the 11°C outcome.
  • Intraday volatility on April 2: Down 6% then up 5.5% in the same session, consistent with a model update cycle pushing conflicting signals.
  • Prior session catalyst: Up 6.5% on March 31, the first major move in this contract, likely tied to the initial 72-hour forecast window opening for April 3.
  • Liquidity warning: $10,060 available means price is highly sensitive to any new trade or data drop before resolution.
  • Open interest: At zero, all current positions are net settled or this metric reflects contract structure. Resolution is imminent regardless.

MGEM and the Case for Both Sides

The case for YES rests on the forecast signal that drove the April 2 recovery. If numerical weather prediction models for Ankara are converging on an 11°C maximum, the 42% price is arguably cheap. Early April cold air incursions across central Turkey are not uncommon, and Ankara’s elevation (roughly 938 meters above sea level) makes it cooler than the surrounding lowlands. A surface high pressure system over the Black Sea or a late-season trough dropping from Eastern Europe could hold the high at 11°C. The data doesn’t care about the politics of whether this feels like an unseasonably cold day.

The case for NO is simply that eleven discrete buckets exist and only one resolves YES. At 58%, NO reflects the structural reality that pinpointing a single-degree outcome is difficult. Ankara’s April 3 high landing at 10°C or 12°C instead of 11°C means NO wins identically. Temperature forecast error for 48-hour outlooks at a single station commonly runs plus or minus 2°C, which means models centered on 11°C still give substantial probability mass to neighboring buckets.

  • Watch: ECMWF and GFS model agreement on Ankara April 3 temperatures. Convergence toward 11°C would push YES higher.
  • Watch: Turkish State Meteorological Service (MGM) official forecast update for Ankara on April 2-3. Any shift toward 10°C or 12°C reprices NO.
  • Watch: Upper-level trough position over Eastern Europe. A deeper trough holds colder air over Anatolia and supports sub-12°C outcomes.
  • Watch: Surface wind direction at Ankara Esenboga Airport. Northerly flow correlates with cooler daily maxima.
  • Watch: Resolution timing at 12:00 local. If Ankara hasn’t reached its daily high by noon, the recorded value may undercount the true maximum for the day.

The $72,504 in total volume reflects real trader engagement for a single-station, single-day temperature contract. Both sides have committed capital, and the 24-hour surge shows active repositioning as forecast data updated. The data favors neither side conclusively right now. What matters in the next 18 hours is whether the dominant weather models lock onto 11°C or drift a degree in either direction.

LINES VERDICT

NO Favored on Structural Grounds

With twelve outcome buckets and forecast uncertainty spanning multiple degrees, the 58% NO price reflects the base difficulty of hitting a single-degree target, not a confident call on the weather.

What the market says: 42% for YES means traders see 11°C as the single most likely outcome but still assign a 58% chance the high lands somewhere else. Thin liquidity means this price could move sharply in either direction before the April 3 resolution.

Key unknown: The ECMWF 00Z model run on April 2-3 for Ankara’s surface maximum temperature is the single most important data point. A forecast centering on 11°C pushes YES toward 50% or higher. A shift toward 12°C or 10°C collapses YES toward 25%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Traders collectively assign an approximately 42% chance that Ankara’s official April 3 daily high temperature lands exactly at 11°C. The remaining 58% is distributed across ten other temperature buckets.

A NO buyer profits if Ankara’s April 3 maximum is any temperature other than 11°C. With twelve possible outcomes, NO wins in ten of eleven alternative scenarios.

A Turkish State Meteorological Service (MGM) or ECMWF model update centering Ankara’s April 3 high on 11°C versus an adjacent value is the primary price driver before resolution.

Resolution is set for 2026-04-03 12:00:00. The official daily maximum temperature recorded at that point determines the outcome for all temperature bucket contracts in this series.

$72,504 in total volume is modest. With only $10,060 in liquidity, this market is thin, and prices can shift sharply on a single new trade or forecast update. Treat the probability as directional, not precise.

We aggregate the live positions of the top 50 Polymarket whales (ranked by 30-day tracked volume) into one composite reading per market. It refreshes every hour. The percentage shows how many of those whales hold YES versus NO; the net dollar position shows the cohort's directional exposure in dollars.

A convergence event fires when three or more tracked wallets buy the same outcome on the same market within a four-hour window. We surface these in the activity feed and the VIP digest.

No. Lines is an editorial and data product. We do not operate prediction markets, custody funds, or accept trades. All trade flows deep-link to Polymarket via our affiliate code. Probabilities shown are market-implied and not predictions or recommendations.

Market Resolved Outcome: YES
Final Price 100%
Settled Apr 3, 2026
Duration 4 days

Resolution Analysis

YES Supporting Factors

ECMWF and GFS models converge on an 11°C Ankara maximum for April 3, with a cold trough dropping from Eastern Europe keeping temperatures below the seasonal norm. Turkish MGM issues an official forecast centered on 11°C. Traders reprice YES from 42% toward 55-60% as forecast uncertainty collapses in the final 12-hour window.

YES Risk Factors

A southerly or southwesterly flow pattern develops over central Anatolia, pushing Ankara's April 3 maximum to 13°C or 14°C and collapsing YES to near 15%. Model guidance drifts warmer through the April 2 evening run, triggering a fast repricing. Thin liquidity means even modest sell pressure drives a sharp price drop.

NO Comeback Scenario

Even if current models favor 11°C, a 10°C high caused by persistent morning cloud cover and light northerly winds would win for NO just as cleanly as a warmer outcome. Ankara's Esenboga station sits in a valley prone to temperature inversions that can suppress daytime maxima below model guidance, landing the outcome one bucket lower.

Wildcard Factor

A late-breaking upper-level cutoff low stalls over western Turkey overnight April 2-3, dropping temperatures across central Anatolia by 3-4°C relative to model guidance. This shifts probability mass sharply toward the 8°C or 9°C buckets, making both YES and the current high-probability NO buckets losers simultaneously. Traders holding 11°C YES contracts would see value collapse rapidly.

Key macro factor: Early April atmospheric circulation over the eastern Mediterranean is transitional; a lingering La Nina pattern suppressing Mediterranean moisture flux could increase the frequency of cold northerly intrusions into Anatolia through mid-April.

Market Timeline

Mar 29, 2026, 6:23 PM
Market Created
Mar 29, 2026, 10:01 PM
Event Start
Mar 29, 2026, 10:04 PM
Market Opened
Apr 3, 2026
Market Resolution

Market Comments

Probabilities shown are market-implied and not predictions or recommendations. This content is for informational purposes only.