Rolr3 1920x300
Moscow July 9 High Temp: Will 21°C Hit?

Moscow July 9 High Temp: Will 21°C Hit?

View on Polymarket →
SR Sofia Renard Climate & Science Analyst
Embed this market
Resolution Verdict
YES Market Resolved

Market has ended. Final implied probability: 100%.

Resolved
Volume
$55.8K
$43.7K in 24h
Liquidity
$124.9K
Deep liquidity
Time Left
Ended
Resolves Jul 9
56K Vol. Ended
20°C $9K Vol.
100%
21°C $10K Vol.
0%
22°C $4K Vol.
0%
14°C or below $2K Vol.
0%
15°C $2K Vol.
0%
16°C $2K Vol.
0%

Moscow’s weather market for July 9 sits at a crossroads that forecasters and traders rarely agree on. The 21°C outcome carries a 26.5% implied probability, meaning the market treats it as a realistic but far-from-dominant scenario. With resolution just two days out, short-range forecast models are the only tool that matters here.

The market question asks: what will be the highest temperature in Moscow on July 9? The 21°C outcome is priced at $0.27 YES against $0.74 NO. The market resolves on July 9, 2026 at 12:00 UTC. Total volume stands at $3,119, which is thin enough to flag immediately: this is a low-liquidity contract where a single meaningful trade can move the price sharply.

How the Moscow July 9 Temperature Contract Works

YES pays out if Moscow’s official daily maximum temperature on July 9 reaches exactly 21°C, as determined by the resolution source. NO pays out if the high lands at any other value, including 20°C, 22°C, or any temperature outside that single degree. With ten alternative outcomes on the board, each siphons probability from every other option.

  • YES ($0.27): Moscow’s high on July 9 hits exactly 21°C.
  • NO ($0.74): Moscow’s high lands at any temperature other than 21°C.

The NO contract is structurally strong here for a simple reason: ten competing outcomes divide the probability space. A forecast showing 21°C carries real uncertainty in both directions. If European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) or GFS models shift the expected high to 22°C or 20°C by late July 8, the NO side captures that move automatically. The market is pricing a multi-outcome scenario, not a binary.

Sponsored Partner
ROLRROLR

Momentum and Market Signals

The momentum composite here is modest. The trend score sits at 36.54, the 1-hour change shows no movement, and the 24-hour change is unavailable. The single notable move was a 6.5% price increase on July 7, which brought the YES price from $0.24 to $0.27. That move likely reflects a short-range forecast update nudging the predicted high toward 21°C.

Volume tells a cautionary tale. Total volume is $3,119, all of it arriving in the last 24 hours. Liquidity is $38,534, which is higher than volume by a factor of twelve. That gap means market makers have depth, but actual trading conviction is thin. One informed trader with a fresh weather model printout could reprice this contract meaningfully before resolution.

  • The YES price jumped 6.5% on July 7, consistent with a short-range model update showing 21°C in the forecast window.
  • The 1-hour price change of 0.0% signals the market has stabilized at current pricing pending new forecast data.
  • The trend score of 36.54 leans bearish, reflecting the dominant NO probability across all alternative outcomes.
  • Volume below $1,000 equivalent per competing outcome signals low collective conviction on any single temperature call.
  • Liquidity at $38,534 exceeds volume dramatically, meaning price can move sharply on thin new buying or selling.

Lines Analysis: Moscow’s Temperature Range and What Moves the Needle

Moscow in early July typically sees daily highs in the 18°C to 26°C range, with significant variability depending on Atlantic air mass positioning and local urban heat effects. The 21°C outcome sits in the middle of that distribution, which is why it holds a 26.5% share. It is a credible forecast, not a long shot. But being credible in a ten-outcome field means the market still assigns nearly three-to-one odds against it landing precisely there.

What threatens the YES outcome most directly is forecast drift. Short-range weather models update every six to twelve hours. A shift of even one degree in the ECMWF or GFS ensemble mean for Moscow on July 9 would concentrate probability on 20°C or 22°C instead. The market is pricing uncertainty, not science, and the uncertainty window narrows fast as July 9 approaches.

  • ECMWF and GFS ensemble updates in the next 36 hours will be the primary price driver for this contract.
  • Any significant surface high pressure building over Eastern Europe would push the Moscow high toward 23°C or above, strengthening alternative NO outcomes.
  • A westerly flow bringing cooler Atlantic air would shift probability toward 18°C to 20°C outcomes.
  • Official Russian meteorological service (Roshydromet) forecasts issued July 8 will likely anchor the final market price before resolution.
  • The exact measurement methodology and station used for resolution matters: urban station readings in Moscow can run one to two degrees warmer than suburban sites.

The data right now favors the broad NO position, simply because ten outcomes compete for probability and none holds a dominant share. Total volume of $3,119 reflects a market in early price discovery, not one where informed traders have converged on a signal. The side that benefits most from that uncertainty is NO, which wins across nine of ten possible outcomes.

LINES VERDICT

NO Favored, Multi-Outcome Field Dominates

With ten competing temperature outcomes splitting the probability space, the structural advantage belongs to NO. The 21°C outcome is plausible, but short-range forecast drift in either direction makes it unlikely to land precisely on that value.

What the market says: The 26.5% implied probability reflects genuine forecast uncertainty two days before resolution. Thin volume means price is highly sensitive to any fresh model output or Roshydromet forecast issued before July 9. As the resolution date closes in, expect price to move sharply if the 48-hour model ensemble shifts even one degree.

Key unknown: The ECMWF and GFS ensemble updates scheduled for July 7 and July 8 are the single most important input. A forecast shift toward 20°C or 22°C as the Moscow high would immediately reprice the YES contract lower and consolidate probability on an adjacent outcome.

Frequently Asked Questions

It means the market estimates roughly a one-in-four chance Moscow's July 9 high lands exactly at 21°C. Nine other temperature outcomes split the remaining probability, making any single outcome unlikely to dominate.

NO pays out if Moscow's official high on July 9 is anything other than 21°C. That includes 20°C, 22°C, or any other temperature, giving NO a structural edge across nine competing outcomes.

ECMWF and GFS ensemble model updates on July 7 and July 8 are the primary drivers. A forecast shift of even one degree toward 20°C or 22°C would reprice the YES contract sharply downward before resolution.

The market resolves July 9, 2026 at 12:00 UTC. Resolution depends on the official daily maximum temperature reading for Moscow as specified by the market's resolution source.

No. Volume below $5,000 on a multi-outcome contract is thin. Liquidity is $38,534, meaning a single informed trade could move the YES price meaningfully. Treat the current 26.5% as a provisional estimate.

We aggregate the live positions of the top 50 Polymarket whales (ranked by 30-day tracked volume) into one composite reading per market. It refreshes every hour. The percentage shows how many of those whales hold YES versus NO; the net dollar position shows the cohort's directional exposure in dollars.

A convergence event fires when three or more tracked wallets buy the same outcome on the same market within a four-hour window. We surface these in the activity feed and the VIP digest.

No. Lines is an editorial and data product. We do not operate prediction markets, custody funds, or accept trades. All trade flows deep-link to Polymarket via our affiliate code. Probabilities shown are market-implied and not predictions or recommendations.

What Could Shift These Probabilities?

Model Consensus Locks on 21°C

If ECMWF and GFS ensemble updates released July 7 and July 8 both center the Moscow high at 21°C with low spread, informed traders would buy YES aggressively. Thin liquidity means even modest new volume could push the YES price from $0.27 toward $0.40 or higher as resolution approaches.

Forecast Drift Pulls High to 22°C or 20°C

Any shift in the 48-hour ensemble mean by one degree in either direction concentrates probability on an adjacent outcome. If models converge on 22°C, YES holders face rapid price erosion toward $0.10 or lower, while NO holds firm across the multi-outcome field.

Roshydromet Forecast Pins Exactly 21°C

The Russian meteorological service Roshydromet issues local forecasts with finer regional calibration than global models. A July 8 Roshydromet bulletin specifically calling for a 21°C Moscow high would signal confidence in that outcome and likely trigger renewed YES buying from weather-informed traders.

Unexpected Convective Event Changes the Outcome

Summer convection near Moscow can create rapid temperature changes within a single day. An unexpected afternoon thunderstorm on July 9 could pull the high down to 18°C or 19°C, collapsing probability on both 21°C and neighboring outcomes. Low-probability temperature extremes at either end would catch most traders off guard.

Key macro factor: Early July Atlantic blocking patterns and Eastern European surface pressure systems are the dominant large-scale drivers of Moscow temperature variability, with no El Nino or La Nina signal directly relevant to this short-window contract.

Market Timeline

Jul 7, 4:03 AM
Market Created
Jul 7, 4:03 AM
Market Opened
12:00 PM
Market Resolution

Market Comments

Probabilities shown are market-implied and not predictions or recommendations. This content is for informational purposes only.