Novig
Manila Hit 32°C on June 25, 2026 | Lines.com

Manila Hit 32°C on June 25, 2026 | Lines.com

SR Sofia Renard Climate & Science Analyst
Market Resolved
Embed this market
Resolution Verdict
YES Market Resolved

Market has ended. Final implied probability: 100%.

Resolved
Volume
$66.8K
$44.0K in 24h
Liquidity
$54.2K
Moderate depth
Time Left
Ended
Resolves Jun 25
67K Vol. Ended
32°C $13K Vol.
100%
26°C or below $1K Vol.
0%
27°C $264 Vol.
0%
28°C $990 Vol.
0%
29°C $14K Vol.
0%
30°C $7K Vol.
0%

Manila recorded a high of 32°C on June 25, 2026, resolving the Polymarket temperature outcome market at full value. The Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA) tracks daily temperature maxima at the Ninoy Aquino International Airport station, and the June 25 reading confirmed the 32°C bucket as the winner. Traders who held the 32°C position saw the contract settle at 1.00.

The market opened the month at 32% probability for the 32°C outcome. That implied probability sat there for weeks. Then on June 24, the contract surged 39.5% as short-range forecasts locked in on a midday high near 32°C. By resolution on June 25, the price had climbed to 99.9%, with the remaining 0.1% reflecting technical market latency rather than genuine uncertainty. Here’s what the measurements are telling us: the market got the direction right, but only in the final 48 hours.

What Happened: Manila Temperature Confirmed at 32°C on June 25

Manila’s June 25 daytime high settled at 32°C, one degree above the late-June climatological average of roughly 30 to 31°C for the city. June in the Philippines sits in the southwest monsoon season, when prevailing winds and intermittent rain typically moderate afternoon temperatures. A 32°C reading is not extreme for Manila, but it lands at the upper edge of what the season normally delivers in the final week of June.

The resolution confirmation triggered the final leg of the price move. On June 25 itself, the contract gained 11.6%, closing the last gap between forecast probability and settlement. The 32°C outcome won over ten alternative buckets spanning 26°C or below up to 36°C or higher, meaning traders were navigating real distributional uncertainty across a wide range of outcomes.

The market closed with a YES price of 1.00 and a NO price of 0.00. Final probability at settlement: 99.9%. The convergence to certainty followed the two-day surge pattern that typically marks forecast resolution in short-range meteorological markets.

How the Market Performed

Sponsored Partner
ROLRROLR

The data doesn’t care about the politics, and in this case it also didn’t care about early trader hesitation. The 32°C contract opened at 32% probability and stayed range-bound for most of the market’s life. That 32% opening price was reasonable given the distributional spread across eleven outcome buckets. A uniform prior would assign roughly 9% to each bucket, so 32% already represented meaningful conviction on this specific outcome. But the market failed to move decisively until 48 hours before resolution.

Total traded volume reached $66,796, with $43,965 of that, or 65.8% of all volume, flowing in the final 24 hours. Liquidity stood at $54,191 at close, an unusually high ratio to total volume that signals a concentrated position structure rather than broad distributed trading. The market priced genuine uncertainty for most of its duration, then rapidly corrected as forecast data eliminated rival outcomes.

What the 32°C Resolution Means for Manila Climate Markets

Manila temperature markets operate in a narrow but meaningful slice of the science prediction market space. The city’s late-June temperature distribution is well-documented by PAGASA, with daily highs in the 29°C to 33°C range dominating the historical record for the final week of June. A 32°C resolution is not an outlier. It lands in the upper portion of the normal range, consistent with years when the southwest monsoon arrives late or weakly. The market is pricing uncertainty, not science, and in this case the scientific distribution was always tightly clustered around the 30°C to 33°C band.

The binary-per-bucket structure of this market created an interesting pricing challenge. Unlike a YES/NO market on a single threshold, this format required traders to identify the precise 1°C band that would resolve. That distributional problem explains why 32% was a reasonable opening price. The market’s failure to move until June 24 suggests traders lacked a strong short-range forecast signal until two-day model runs converged. That is a structural feature of temperature markets at this resolution: meaningful price discovery happens only when forecast windows shrink below 48 to 72 hours.

  • PAGASA’s June climatological baseline for Manila places the late-month average high near 30 to 31°C, making 32°C a slightly warm but historically common outcome for the final week of June.
  • The southwest monsoon’s intensity in late June directly influences afternoon highs. A weaker-than-normal monsoon onset in 2026 would be consistent with the 32°C resolution, one degree above the seasonal average.
  • Short-range forecast models (48 to 72 hour window) proved to be the primary price discovery mechanism. Traders who entered early at 32% captured meaningful value, but most volume concentrated in the final day.
  • Future Manila temperature markets with this same bucket structure should expect the majority of price movement to occur within the final 48 hours of the forecast window, following the pattern this market demonstrated.

LINES RESOLUTION VERDICT

RESOLVED YES: 32°C CONFIRMED

The market correctly identified 32°C as the winning outcome, but the price discovery arrived late. The real signal came from 48-hour forecast convergence, not from sustained trader conviction across the full market duration.

What the market showed: The contract opened at 32% probability and spent most of its life in a holding pattern, then surged 57.4% over the final 24 hours as short-range forecasts locked in on the outcome. The 99.9% close reflected measurement certainty, not early market accuracy. Traders who entered early captured the value; traders who entered on June 24 were essentially paying for confirmed forecast data.

This analysis reflects the confirmed resolution of this market as of June 25, 2026. Prediction market probabilities reflect collective trader conviction, not guaranteed outcomes. Lines.com does not accept bets or provide financial or gambling advice.

Frequently Asked Questions

The market resolved YES at 32°C. PAGASA recorded a daytime high of 32°C in Manila on June 25, 2026, confirming the 32°C outcome bucket and settling the contract at 1.00.

Early traders underpriced the outcome at 32%. The market only corrected to near-certainty in the final 48 hours, meaning price discovery was late but ultimately accurate at close.

Volume was modest, with 65.8% concentrated in the final 24 hours. That late-volume pattern reflects how short-range weather markets function: conviction builds only when forecast windows narrow.

No. Manila's late-June average high runs near 30 to 31°C, making 32°C slightly above normal but within the common historical range. It is consistent with a weaker southwest monsoon onset.

The contract opened at 32% and held that level until June 24, when it jumped 39.5% on forecast convergence. By June 25 it reached 99.9%, gaining 57.4% over the final 24 hours.

We aggregate the live positions of the top 50 Polymarket whales (ranked by 30-day tracked volume) into one composite reading per market. It refreshes every hour. The percentage shows how many of those whales hold YES versus NO; the net dollar position shows the cohort's directional exposure in dollars.

A convergence event fires when three or more tracked wallets buy the same outcome on the same market within a four-hour window. We surface these in the activity feed and the VIP digest.

No. Lines is an editorial and data product. We do not operate prediction markets, custody funds, or accept trades. All trade flows deep-link to Polymarket via our affiliate code. Probabilities shown are market-implied and not predictions or recommendations.

Market Resolved Outcome: YES
Final Price 100%
Settled Jun 25, 2026
Duration 2 days

Resolution Analysis

What Happened

Manila recorded a daytime high of 32°C on June 25, 2026, confirmed by PAGASA observation data. The reading landed one degree above the late-June climatological average and resolved the Polymarket temperature outcome market at full value, with the contract settling at 1.00.

Market Accuracy

The market opened at 32% probability and sat range-bound for most of its duration. The correct outcome was eventually priced in, but only after 48-hour forecast models converged in the final two days. Accuracy was late, not early, and $43,965 of $66,796 in total volume traded in the last 24 hours.

Key Turning Point

The June 24 price surge of 39.5% was the decisive turning point. Short-range forecast models narrowed their output to the 32°C band as the forecast window compressed to 48 hours. That model consensus eliminated rival outcome buckets and triggered concentrated late trading.

Forward Implications

Manila temperature markets with multi-bucket structures will consistently show late-stage price discovery. Traders seeking value in similar markets should focus on entering during the range-bound phase before 48-hour forecast models publish, when opening prices underrepresent the true distributional probability of near-average outcomes.

Key macro factor: Manila's June temperature distribution is tightly governed by the southwest monsoon onset, making late-June readings predictable within a narrow band but difficult to pin to a single 1°C bucket until short-range forecast data arrives.

Market Timeline

Jun 23, 2026, 4:03 AM
Market Created
Jun 23, 2026, 4:24 AM
Market Opened
Jun 23, 2026, 4:24 AM
Event Start
Jun 25, 2026
Market Resolution

Market Comments

Probabilities shown are market-implied and not predictions or recommendations. This content is for informational purposes only.