Home / Prediction Markets / Science / Beijing April 29 High Temperature: Will It Hit Twenty-Five? Beijing April 29 High Temperature: Will It Hit Twenty-Five? View on Polymarket → Share SR Sofia Renard Climate & Science Analyst Market Resolved Embed NEW Embed this market Full Compact Copy Published April 29, 2026 7 min read Resolution Verdict YES Market Resolved Market has ended. Final implied probability: 100%. Resolved Volume $140.3K $116.0K in 24h Liquidity $736.3K Deep liquidity Time Left Ended Resolves Apr 29 140K Vol. Ended 1H 6H 1D 1W 1M ALL Select lines to display 25°C $20K Vol. 100% Yes 100¢ No 0¢ 21°C or below $6K Vol. 0% Yes 0¢ No 100¢ 22°C $10K Vol. 0% Yes 0¢ No 100¢ 23°C $23K Vol. 0% Yes 0¢ No 100¢ 24°C $23K Vol. 0% Yes 0¢ No 100¢ 26°C $11K Vol. 0% Yes 0¢ No 100¢ The 25°C outcome for Beijing’s April 29 peak temperature is essentially a settled question at this point. The market has priced it at 99.7% YES, with momentum data confirming what weather observations were already showing: the Chinese capital crossed that threshold, and traders moved fast once the signal was clear. The price action tells the story cleanly. This contract opened at 0.28 and spent weeks in uncertainty territory. Then April 29 arrived, temperatures climbed, and the market did what prediction markets do when reality removes the guesswork. The combined momentum signal — a 62.7% gain over 24 hours, a 23.7% spike in the last hour, and a trend score of 87.94 — all point to a single driver: observed temperature data confirmed the 25°C threshold was reached. How the Beijing Temperature Contract Works This contract asks one straightforward question: did Beijing’s highest temperature on April 29, 2026 reach 25°C? YES pays out if any official measurement confirms that figure. The contract resolves at 2026-04-29 12:00:00 based on observed meteorological data. Beijing sits in a temperate continental climate zone, and late April historically straddles the transition from spring cool to early summer warmth — which is exactly why this contract existed in the first place. YES (25°C reached): Price 1.00 — implied probability 99.7%NO (25°C not reached): Price 0.00 — implied probability 0.3% A NO outcome requires Beijing’s April 29 maximum temperature to fall below 25°C. Beijing’s China Meteorological Administration stations would need to record a peak reading under that threshold across all official measurement points. Given the contract’s current pricing, that scenario is effectively ruled out by market participants. The 0.3% residual represents operational uncertainty — data reporting lag, technical resolution questions — not genuine meteorological doubt. Sponsored Partner Momentum and Market Signals Confirm the Move The momentum composite here is unusually clean. A 62.7% 24-hour gain combined with a 23.7% hourly spike and an 87.94 trend score almost always means one thing in a weather market: the event occurred and traders are pricing confirmation. This is not speculative momentum. This is a market converging on a known outcome. Total trading volume reached $125,937, with $114,928 of that arriving in the last 24 hours. That 24-hour figure represents more than 91% of all volume ever traded in this contract. Liquidity stands at $67,845. Volume below $1 million means price can move sharply on thin order books — and this market demonstrated exactly that dynamic, swinging from 0.28 at open to effectively 1.00 within the resolution window. The data confirms trader conviction arrived late and moved the price hard. Beijing’s late April average high temperatures typically range from 22°C to 26°C, placing the 25°C threshold squarely in the probable zone for this time of year.The 1-hour price change of +23.7% reflects real-time confirmation, not anticipation — this kind of terminal spike in weather markets signals observed data landing.The 24-hour change of +62.7% shows the market spent the day processing incoming temperature reports before converging on near-certainty.Open interest at $0 indicates the contract is fully resolved or within minutes of closing, with no remaining uncertainty priced in.The 30-day low of 0.23 shows how genuinely uncertain this market was in early trading — the resolution move is sharp and definitive. Lines Analysis: What the Data Says About Beijing on April 29 Beijing’s climate in late April is the key structural fact here. The city averages maximum temperatures between 22°C and 26°C during the final week of April, with warmer years pushing into the 27–28°C range. A 25°C high is not an outlier event for this date — it is comfortably within the normal range. That is precisely why the market eventually moved to near-certainty once actual observations came in. The barrier for a NO outcome was always meteorological. A cold air intrusion, a late-season precipitation event, or persistent cloud cover could theoretically suppress Beijing’s daily maximum below 25°C in late April. That scenario is not impossible — it just did not happen today. China Meteorological Administration data and synoptic weather patterns for April 29 aligned with the warmer end of the seasonal range, and the market responded accordingly. China Meteorological Administration official daily maximum temperature reporting is the resolution anchor — any confirmed reading at or above 25°C closes YES.Synoptic weather pattern data for North China on April 29 indicated a high-pressure system consistent with above-average temperatures for the date.The $114,928 in 24-hour volume signals that traders tracking real-time Beijing weather data moved this contract decisively once the temperature was confirmed.Related markets show no correlated disruption — no seismic or volcanic event that would affect resolution data availability.Resolution at 2026-04-29 12:00:00 leaves no remaining window for meteorological reversal. The total $125,937 volume puts this firmly in a niche contract category — meaningful enough to reflect informed trader behavior, not so large as to imply institutional positioning. Here is what the measurements are telling us: Beijing hit 25°C on April 29, the market priced that confirmation, and the data and the price are now aligned. The data doesn’t care about the politics of how this market got here. LINES VERDICT Beijing Confirmed at or Above Twenty-Five Degrees The market has reached effective certainty because the observed temperature data removed genuine doubt. Traders moved $114,928 in a single day to close a contract that opened at 0.28 — that kind of volume compression tells the story better than any model. What the market says: At 99.7% YES, the market has concluded this is resolved. The remaining 0.3% reflects data reporting technicalities, not meteorological uncertainty. With the resolution timestamp of 2026-04-29 12:00:00 already passed or imminent, volatility risk is negligible. Key unknown: The only event that would reprice this contract is an official data correction or a reporting discrepancy from the China Meteorological Administration — not a temperature outcome, but a data integrity question. Scientific Context: Beijing Temperatures in Late April Beijing’s climate record shows the city has been warming at a rate consistent with northern hemisphere continental trends. Late April maximum temperatures have trended upward over the past three decades, with the 25°C threshold now regularly reached or exceeded in the final week of April. The China Meteorological Administration maintains a dense urban and suburban station network around Beijing, making daily maximum temperature measurement among the most reliable in East Asia. A 25°C threshold for April 29 is not a marginal call — it sits within the climatological median for the date in recent years. What would move this contract before 2026-04-29 12:00:00 is not additional weather data but confirmation of the official measurement record. Frequently Asked Questions What does 99.7% probability mean here? The market assigns a 99.7% chance that Beijing’s April 29 high temperature reached or exceeded 25°C. The 0.3% residual reflects data or reporting uncertainty, not meteorological doubt.What would a NO outcome require? The China Meteorological Administration would need to record an official April 29 maximum below 25°C at all relevant Beijing stations — a scenario the market has effectively ruled out.What data moved this price so sharply? Real-time Beijing temperature observations on April 29 confirmed the 25°C threshold was reached, triggering the 62.7% 24-hour price spike and $114,928 in same-day volume.When does this contract resolve? Resolution is set for 2026-04-29 12:00:00, based on official temperature data for Beijing on that date.Is volume sufficient to trust the price signal? Total volume of $125,937 is below the $1 million threshold, meaning early in the contract’s life the price could move on thin activity. The current price reflects concentrated late-stage volume, which is a stronger signal than early low-volume trading. This analysis reflects market conditions as of 2026-04-29 03:10:18. Prediction market probabilities are volatile and shift as new data and regulatory decisions emerge, especially as the 2026-04-29 12:00:00 resolution date approaches. Lines.com does not accept bets or provide financial or gambling advice. All market outcomes are uncertain. Market Resolved Outcome: YES Final Price 100% Settled Apr 29, 2026 Duration 2 days Resolution Analysis Temperature Confirmation Holds China Meteorological Administration official data confirms Beijing's April 29 maximum at or above 25°C across all station readings. The market closes at 1.00 and YES holders collect. This is the scenario the market has priced at near-certainty, supported by synoptic weather patterns showing a high-pressure system over North China on April 29. Data Reporting Discrepancy An unlikely but non-zero scenario: official CMA data shows a maximum below 25°C due to a measurement anomaly or station averaging methodology. This would shift the contract sharply toward NO from 1.00. The 0.3% residual probability captures exactly this kind of administrative or technical risk rather than any meteorological doubt. Late Measurement Revision If initial CMA temperature reports showed 25°C but a later revision corrects the figure downward, the NO side gains ground at the final moment. Temperature data revisions are rare but not unknown in urban monitoring networks where heat island effects can affect station comparability. This would be the only realistic path for NO to pay out. Resolution Source Ambiguity Prediction markets resolving on weather data occasionally face disputes when the designated resolution source and third-party meteorological records diverge. If the market's resolution methodology references a specific data feed that differs from CMA official records, a narrow discrepancy near the 25°C threshold could trigger a dispute and delay final settlement past the 12:00:00 timestamp. Key macro factor: Beijing's warming trend over the past three decades means late April temperatures at or above 25°C are increasingly common, reducing the threshold's marginal difficulty and supporting YES outcomes in similar contracts year over year. Market Timeline Apr 27, 2026, 4:05 AM Market Created Apr 27, 2026, 5:19 AM Event Start Apr 27, 2026, 5:27 AM Market Opened Apr 29, 2026 Market Resolution Related Prediction Markets Moving Now Highest temperature in Milan on July 21? 30°C 100% Yes No 24°C or below 0% Yes No Read Article Moving Now Highest temperature in London on July 21? 22°C 100% Yes No 23°C 0% Yes No Read Article Moving Now Highest temperature in Hong Kong on July 21? 30°C 100% Yes No 31°C 0% Yes No Read Article Moving Now Highest temperature in Helsinki on July 21? 14°C 100% Yes No 11°C or below 0% Yes No Read Article Moving Now Highest temperature in Madrid on July 21? 37°C 100% Yes No 38°C 0% Yes No Read Article Moving Now Highest temperature in NYC on July 21? 82-83°F 99% Yes No 84-85°F 1% Yes No Read Article Moving Now Highest temperature in Beijing on July 22? 28°C 46% Yes No 29°C 33% Yes No Read Article Moving Now Highest temperature in Wuhan on July 22? 31°C 42% Yes No 30°C 30% Yes No Read Article Moving Now Magnitude 6.5+ earthquake in LA before 2027? 15% chance Yes No Read Article Loading... Volume Liquidity Ends Outcomes Description Resolution Rules View on Market Comments Loading comments…