Home / Prediction Markets / Science / Shenzhen June 9 High Temperature: Market Settled at 27C Shenzhen June 9 High Temperature: Market Settled at 27C Market called it correctly Implied 100% at publication · Resolved YES · Brier score: 0.00 See full track record SR Sofia Renard Climate & Science Analyst Market Resolved Embed NEW Embed this market Full Compact Copy Published June 9, 2026 6 min read Resolution Verdict YES Market Resolved SETTLED: The 27C outcome commands 99.5% probability because observational data confirmed the reading before market close. Market probability: 99.5%. Resolved Volume $192.4K $177.6K in 24h Liquidity $119.8K Deep liquidity Time Left Ended Resolves Jun 9 192K Vol. Ended 1H 6H 1D 1W 1M 1Y ALL Select lines to display 27°C $32K Vol. 100% Buy Yes 99.7¢ Buy No 0.3¢ 28°C $14K Vol. 0% Buy Yes 0.4¢ Buy No 99.6¢ 29°C $8K Vol. 0% Buy Yes 0.2¢ Buy No 99.9¢ 22°C or below $375 Vol. 0% Buy Yes 0.1¢ Buy No 100¢ 23°C $610 Vol. 0% Buy Yes 0.1¢ Buy No 100¢ 24°C $3K Vol. 0% Buy Yes 0.1¢ Buy No 100¢ Shenzhen’s temperature market for June 9 has already told its story. The 27°C outcome sits at 99.5% implied probability, with the market absorbing nearly its entire $168,115 trading volume in the last 24 hours. This is not a market pricing uncertainty. The data has resolved the question before the clock runs out. The market question asks: what is the highest temperature in Shenzhen on June 9? The 27°C outcome trades at $0.99. All other outcomes, including 28°C, 26°C, and the full range from 22°C or below through 32°C or higher, trade at or near zero. The market resolves at 12:00 UTC on June 9, 2026. Total volume stands at $168,115. How the Shenzhen June 9 Temperature Contract Works This contract resolves YES for the 27°C outcome if Shenzhen’s official daily maximum temperature on June 9 lands at exactly 27°C. The responsible measurement body determines resolution based on reported peak temperature for the calendar day. Each degree band is its own binary contract. Only one outcome pays out. 27°C outcome trades at $0.99, implying 99.5% probability of resolution YES.All other outcomes, including 26°C and 28°C, trade near zero, implying less than 1% probability each. The adjacent outcomes, 26°C and 28°C, would each require Shenzhen’s peak to land exactly one degree off the current consensus reading. Weather stations do not average across degree bands. A single degree deviation reprices every outcome in this range. The market has essentially closed the window on any outcome except 27°C. [[BANNER_BLOCK]] Momentum and Market Signals Moving Into Resolution The momentum composite here is striking and directional. The 27°C outcome gained 37.5% in the last hour and 64.5% over 24 hours, with a trend score of 69.23. That kind of movement in a temperature market almost always reflects actual observational data landing. Real-time temperature readings from Shenzhen were almost certainly confirming the 27°C daily maximum as traders repriced. Volume tells the conviction story just as clearly. Total volume reached $168,115, with $158,209 of that, or roughly 94%, changing hands in the last 24 hours alone. Liquidity sits at $117,160, which is deep for a single-day weather market. This is not thin-book price movement. Capital concentrated into this outcome fast and hard as the temperature data materialized. The 27°C outcome moved from $0.24 at open to $0.99, a gain driven by incoming observational data, not speculative repositioning.The 1-hour gain of 37.5% reflects late-session confirmation as real-time temperature readings locked in the daily maximum.Volume of $158,209 in 24 hours is the clearest conviction signal available in a market this size.Liquidity at $117,160 means the order book has real depth, not a thin-book price spike.Trader sentiment reads 99.5% YES versus 0.5% NO, leaving essentially no organized opposition in the book. Lines Analysis: What the Shenzhen Data Is Saying Here’s what the measurements are telling us. Shenzhen sits in the Pearl River Delta, and early June typically delivers daytime highs in the 27°C to 32°C range as the wet season establishes. A 27°C peak for June 9 sits at the lower end of that climatological range, consistent with cloud cover or intermittent rain suppressing afternoon temperatures. The market priced exactly this scenario as real-time data confirmed the reading. The only path to a different outcome paying out would require a late correction to the official temperature record, a sensor error, or a dispute over the measurement source used for resolution. None of those conditions appear active. The data doesn’t care about the politics, and here the data has spoken clearly enough that 99.5% of market capital agrees. A correction to the official daily maximum above 27°C would reprice the 28°C or higher outcomes sharply upward and collapse the 27°C contract to near zero.A late downward revision to 26°C would similarly reprice the adjacent contract and wipe out 27°C holders.Any dispute over the resolution source is the one genuine tail risk remaining before the 12:00 UTC close.The related market placing Shenzhen in global temperature context (2026 ranking among hottest years at 62%) supports a broader warm baseline, consistent with a 27°C daily floor even in a moderate June day. Total volume of $168,115 with nearly all of it concentrated in the final 24 hours reflects a market that moved decisively as observational data arrived. The data favors 27°C with near-complete conviction. The only question left before 12:00 UTC is whether the official resolution source confirms what real-time sensors have already shown. LINES VERDICT SETTLED: The Market Has Already Priced This as Done The 27°C outcome commands 99.5% of market probability because actual temperature data landed and traders repriced accordingly. The market is not pricing uncertainty here. It is pricing a confirmed reading. What the market says: At 99.5% implied probability, the market treats this outcome as resolved. The only volatility before the 12:00 UTC end date would come from a data correction or a dispute over the resolution source, both of which are low-probability events given the depth of the order book. Key unknown: The single factor that could reprice this contract is a correction to the official daily maximum temperature before the 12:00 UTC resolution window closes. If the measurement source used for resolution differs from the real-time data traders priced, any value other than 27°C would collapse this outcome and redistribute capital to an adjacent degree band. Scientific Context: Shenzhen in Early June Shenzhen’s June climate sits within the South China Sea monsoon influence zone. Early June temperatures typically range from 27°C to 32°C as daily maxima, with cloud cover and rainfall from advancing monsoon moisture frequently keeping afternoons at the lower end of that range. A 27°C peak is climatologically plausible and represents a slightly suppressed reading for the season. The market’s convergence on this outcome is consistent with observed conditions for this type of weather pattern in the Pearl River Delta during the first two weeks of June. What would move this contract before resolution: Only a formal data correction from the measurement authority or a resolution dispute would shift the price materially. The 12:00 UTC close leaves limited time for any new catalyst to emerge. Is a 99.5% probability meaningful on a weather market? Yes. When temperature markets reach 99.5%, it typically means real-time observational data has already confirmed the outcome. Traders are not speculating. They are pricing a known reading. What does the NO contract represent in a temperature band market? The NO side in the 27°C outcome means Shenzhen’s official daily maximum was something other than 27°C. At $0.01, the market assigns less than 1% chance to that happening. What data event would move this market sharply? A correction to Shenzhen’s official daily maximum temperature is the only credible repricing catalyst. A revision from 27°C to 28°C would collapse this outcome and spike the 28°C contract. When does this contract resolve? The contract resolves at 12:00 UTC on June 9, 2026, based on the official daily maximum temperature for Shenzhen on that date. Is the volume reliable enough to trust this market? Total volume of $168,115 with $158,209 traded in the last 24 hours and $117,160 in liquidity gives this market solid depth. Price movements at this volume level reflect genuine conviction, not thin-book manipulation. Market Resolved Outcome: YES Final Price 100% Settled Jun 9, 2026 Duration 2 days Resolution Analysis Official Confirmation Locks the 27C Reading If the resolution source confirms Shenzhen's daily maximum at exactly 27°C before the 12:00 UTC close, the 27°C outcome pays out at full value. The order book depth of $117,160 and near-total trader consensus at 99.5% suggest the market has already priced this as done. Late capital has nowhere else to go. Data Correction Shifts the Daily Maximum A formal correction to Shenzhen's official daily maximum temperature is the only credible threat to the 27°C outcome. If the measurement authority revises the reading to 28°C or 26°C before resolution, this contract collapses to near zero and the adjacent degree band reprices sharply upward. The window is narrow but the risk is real. Adjacent Outcomes Revive on Measurement Dispute The 26°C and 28°C outcomes each sit near zero but would reprice dramatically if a dispute over the resolution source emerges. Different weather stations in the Shenzhen metro area can record varying peaks. If the resolution body uses a different sensor than the one traders priced, capital would shift fast into the corrected band. Resolution Source Conflict Creates Ambiguity Shenzhen operates multiple official and semi-official weather monitoring stations. If the designated resolution source conflicts with the dominant real-time data feed traders used to reprice, the market faces an ambiguity window before the 12:00 UTC close. That scenario is low-probability given the depth of the order book, but it is the one genuine wildcard left. Key macro factor: Shenzhen's early June climate sits within the South China Sea monsoon influence zone, where cloud cover and advancing monsoon moisture frequently suppress afternoon peaks to the lower end of the 27-32°C seasonal range. Market Timeline Jun 7, 4:06 AM Market Created Jun 7, 4:28 AM Event Start Jun 7, 4:44 AM Market Opened Tuesday, Jun 9 Market Resolution Related Prediction Markets Moving Now Highest temperature in Los Angeles on June 12? 72-73°F 98% Yes No 74-75°F 5% Yes No Moving Now Highest temperature in Hong Kong on June 12? 30°C 100% Yes No 24°C 0% Yes No Moving Now Highest temperature in Sao Paulo on June 12? 21°C 100% Yes No 22°C 0% Yes No Moving Now Highest temperature in San Francisco on June 12? 70-71°F 97% Yes No 72-73°F 1% Yes No Moving Now Lowest temperature in Seoul on June 13? 16°C 98% Yes No 15°C 1% Yes No Moving Now Lowest temperature in Miami on June 12? 78-79°F 96% Yes No 76-77°F 5% Yes No Moving Now Lowest temperature in Tokyo on June 13? 19°C 98% Yes No 18°C 1% Yes No Moving Now Lowest temperature in Hong Kong on June 12? 26°C 100% Yes No 21°C or below 0% Yes No Moving Now SpaceX IPO: Trading Halted for Volatility? 0% chance Yes No Loading... Volume Liquidity Ends Outcomes Description Resolution Rules View on