Rolr3
Beijing June 7 Temperature: Will 27°C Hold?

Beijing June 7 Temperature: Will 27°C Hold?

Market called it correctly

Implied 100% at publication · Resolved YES · Brier score: 0.00

See full track record
SR Sofia Renard Climate & Science Analyst
Market Resolved
Embed this market
Resolution Verdict
YES Market Resolved

NARROW FAVORITE WITH PRECISION RISK: Forecast convergence drove a credible rally to 57%, but a single-degree resolution requirement in a thin market leaves meaningful uncertainty. Market probability: 57%.

Resolved
ROLRROLR
Volume
$91.7K
$83.6K in 24h
Liquidity
$84.9K
Moderate depth
Time Left
Ended
Resolves Jun 7
92K Vol. Ended

Beijing’s weather market moved fast on June 6. The 27°C outcome opened at 0.28 and hit 0.57 by late evening, a climb of nearly 30 percentage points in 24 hours. That kind of momentum on a next-day temperature contract means traders have seen something in the forecast data. The market is now pricing a 57% chance that Beijing’s highest temperature on June 7 lands exactly at 27°C.

The market question asks: what is the highest temperature in Beijing on June 7? The 27°C outcome trades at $0.57 YES and $0.43 NO, resolving at 12:00 UTC on June 7, 2026. Total volume is $54,364, with $53,306 of that arriving in the last 24 hours. This is almost entirely a single-session market.

How the Twenty-Seven Degree Contract Works

Resolution turns on the verified peak temperature recorded in Beijing on June 7. A YES outcome pays if the official high for the day registers at exactly 27°C. A NO outcome pays if the high lands on any other listed outcome: 26°C, 28°C, 29°C, 30°C, 31°C, 22°C or below, 23°C, 24°C, 25°C, or 32°C or higher.

  • YES at $0.57 implies a 57% probability that Beijing’s June 7 high is exactly 27°C.
  • NO at $0.43 covers every other outcome across ten alternative temperature bands.

The NO side wins whenever the actual peak diverges from 27°C in either direction. Beijing’s June temperatures can swing several degrees based on cloud cover, wind direction from Inner Mongolia, and urban heat dynamics. A reading of 28°C or 26°C is enough to pay NO in full. The precision requirement here is the key risk on the YES side.

Sponsored Partner
ROLRROLR

Momentum and Market Signals

The momentum composite is the strongest signal in this market. A 1-hour price change of +22.5%, a 24-hour change of +29.5%, and a trend score of 86.88 point to a single driver: updated short-range forecast data arriving on June 6 that pinned the expected high near 27°C. When a weather market moves this sharply this close to resolution, it almost always reflects a specific forecast convergence rather than broad sentiment.

Volume tells the conviction story. Total volume is $54,364, with $53,306 trading in the last 24 hours. Liquidity sits at $43,820. This is a thin market by absolute standards, and thin liquidity means price can move sharply on any final weather update before the June 7 noon resolution. A single late forecast revision could reprice this contract within minutes.

  • The 1-hour and 24-hour price changes together confirm this is a forecast-driven rally, not a slow drift.
  • Liquidity of $43,820 is adequate for this market size but leaves room for sharp moves on new data.
  • The trend score of 86.88 sits near the top of the range, signaling strong directional conviction among active traders.
  • Nearly all volume entered in the last 24 hours, making this effectively a same-day market with fresh pricing.
  • Related markets like the global temperature ranking contract (60%) suggest broader weather attention from the same trader base.

Lines Analysis: Beijing Temperature on June 7

Short-range numerical weather prediction models are the primary input for a contract like this. When Beijing forecast models converge on a specific degree reading within 24 to 36 hours of the event, traders who track those outputs move quickly. The rally from 0.28 to 0.57 in a single session reflects exactly that kind of model convergence. Beijing in early June sits in a transitional meteorological window, past the spring dust season but not yet into the full summer heat pattern, which makes 27°C a meteorologically plausible peak for this date range.

The precision requirement is where the NO case lives. Even if traders are right that tomorrow’s high lands in the upper-20s, a final reading of 28°C or 26°C pays NO in full. Beijing’s official temperature stations measure to the nearest degree, and the difference between a 27°C and 28°C peak can come down to afternoon cloud timing or a brief wind shift. The ten-outcome structure of this market spreads probability across a wide range, which means YES at 57% is a strong plurality bet, not a near-certainty.

  • China Meteorological Administration forecast updates arriving before market close would reprice this contract immediately.
  • A forecast shift toward 28°C or 29°C would push capital into adjacent outcome contracts and weaken the 27°C position.
  • Unexpected convective activity or a cold front timing change could push the reading below 27°C, activating lower outcome contracts.
  • The noon UTC resolution time captures the official peak reading for the full Beijing calendar day on June 7.
  • Any divergence between forecast model ensembles in the final hours before resolution is the clearest volatility trigger.

The data as of June 6 favors 27°C as the most likely single outcome. Total volume of $54,364 reflects genuine trader conviction, not a thin speculative position. But the market is pricing a specific degree reading, not a range. The 43% NO probability is not noise. It reflects real uncertainty about whether the peak lands precisely at 27°C versus one degree in either direction.

LINES VERDICT

NARROW FAVORITE WITH PRECISION RISK

The forecast-driven rally to 57% is credible, but this contract resolves on a single degree reading in a city where afternoon temperatures can shift on cloud timing alone.

What the market says: At 57% implied probability, the market has priced 27°C as the most likely single outcome with meaningful conviction. But with resolution hours away and liquidity under $50,000, any final forecast update before noon UTC on June 7 can move this price fast.

Key unknown: The China Meteorological Administration’s final short-range forecast update for Beijing on June 7 morning is the single data point that would reprice this contract. A shift of even one degree in the predicted high changes the market structure entirely.

Frequently Asked Questions

It means traders collectively estimate a 57% chance Beijing’s official peak temperature on June 7 lands at exactly 27°C, based on current forecast data.

NO pays if the verified Beijing high on June 7 is any temperature other than 27°C, including 26°C, 28°C, or any other listed outcome.

A China Meteorological Administration forecast update shifting the predicted Beijing high to 26°C or 28°C would immediately redirect trader capital away from the 27°C outcome.

Resolution is set for 12:00 UTC on June 7, 2026, capturing the official daily high temperature for Beijing on that date.

At $54,364 total volume with $43,820 in liquidity, the market is thin. Price can shift sharply on a single large bet or a new forecast update in the final hours.

Market Resolved Outcome: YES
Final Price 100%
Settled Jun 7, 2026
Duration 1 day

Resolution Analysis

Forecast Models Hold at 27°C

If China Meteorological Administration short-range models maintain a 27°C peak forecast through June 7 morning, additional capital flows into YES and the probability pushes toward 70% or higher. Clear skies and light winds in Beijing would support the reading, and the market would close near its current high with YES holders collecting.

Actual Peak Lands at 28°C or 26°C

Beijing's afternoon temperature can shift by a degree based on cloud timing or a brief wind change from the northwest. If the official station reading comes in at 28°C or 26°C, YES holders collect nothing regardless of how close the forecast was. The precision requirement makes this a genuine risk even if the directional bet is correct.

Adjacent Outcome Contracts Attract Capital

If a forecast update shifts the predicted high toward 28°C or 29°C, traders move capital out of the 27°C contract and into adjacent outcome buckets. The 27°C YES price falls, and holders of those neighboring contracts gain ground. This would not reverse the market direction entirely but would redistribute probability across the outcome range.

Unexpected Convective System Changes the Peak

A fast-moving convective system or unexpected cold advection from Inner Mongolia could push Beijing's June 7 high several degrees below forecast. This scenario would activate the 24°C or 25°C contracts instead, leaving the 27°C position worthless. Short-range model failures of this type are rare but not unprecedented in Beijing's early June pattern.

Key macro factor: Beijing sits in a transitional meteorological window in early June, past peak spring dust advection but not yet into sustained summer heat, making the 27°C range meteorologically consistent with historical June 7 observations.

Market Timeline

Jun 6, 4:05 AM
Market Created
Jun 6, 4:19 AM
Event Start
Jun 6, 4:36 AM
Market Opened
Sunday, Jun 7
Market Resolution

Probabilities shown are market-implied and not predictions or recommendations. This content is for informational purposes only.