Rolr3 1920x300
Beijing July 3 High: Will 36°C Hold as the Peak?

Beijing July 3 High: Will 36°C Hold as the Peak?

View on Polymarket →
SR Sofia Renard Climate & Science Analyst
Embed this market
Lines Verdict
YES at 100% implied probability

NARROW PLURALITY: 36°C is the single most likely outcome in a wide distribution, but exact-degree resolution means NO wins more often than not. Market probability: 36.5%.

100% Market Probability
1h +0.0% 24h +64.0% Trend Moderate (65/100)
Volume
$113.2K
$83.6K in 24h
Liquidity
$178.0K
Deep liquidity
Time Left
7 hours
Resolves Jul 3
113K Vol. Jul 3, 2026

Beijing’s summer heat is one of the more tradeable weather events on Polymarket right now. The market has settled on 36°C as the most likely peak temperature for July 3, but at 36.5% implied probability, that’s a plurality outcome in a crowded field, not a confident consensus. The market is pricing uncertainty, not science.

The question is specific: what will be the highest temperature recorded in Beijing on July 3, 2026? The contract resolves at 12:00 UTC on July 3. Yes trades at $0.37 and No at $0.64, with $12,034 in total volume and $60,365 in available liquidity.

How the 36°C Contract Works

This contract resolves YES if Beijing’s official peak temperature on July 3 lands exactly at 36°C. Any other reading, whether 35°C, 37°C, or anything outside that single degree band, resolves NO. The China Meteorological Administration records the official daily maximum at Beijing Capital Weather Station.

  • YES pays out if Beijing’s official high on July 3 is exactly 36°C ($0.37 per share, 36.5% implied probability).
  • NO pays out if Beijing’s high on July 3 is any temperature other than 36°C ($0.64 per share, 63.5% implied probability).

The NO side wins in most scenarios. Beijing’s temperature on any given summer day spans a wide range of outcomes. Parallel contracts exist for every degree from 30°C or below up to 40°C or higher. The 36°C contract captures only one slice of that distribution. A reading of 37°C or 38°C, both plausible in early July Beijing heat, sends money to entirely different contracts.

Sponsored Partner
ROLRROLR

Momentum and Market Signals

The momentum composite here is quiet. The one-hour price change sits at flat, and the trend score of 39.07 reflects a market that has found a temporary equilibrium rather than one reacting to fresh data. No major weather model update or China Meteorological Administration bulletin appears to have moved traders in the past 24 hours.

Total volume stands at $12,034, essentially all of it accumulated in the current 24-hour window. Liquidity at $60,365 is healthy relative to volume, meaning a single large trade would not dramatically reprice the contract. That said, volume under $50,000 across a multi-outcome temperature market means individual trades can still shift the implied probability by several percentage points before resolution.

  • The 1-hour price is flat at $0.37, with no fresh catalyst visible in the order book.
  • The 24-hour volume of $12,039 accounts for nearly all activity in this contract’s life, suggesting most traders entered recently as July 3 approached.
  • Liquidity at $60,365 is strong enough to absorb moderate-size trades without distorting prices significantly.
  • The trend score of 39.07 places this contract in neutral-to-bearish territory for the 36°C outcome.
  • Trader sentiment leans bearish on this specific outcome, with 63.5% of implied probability sitting on NO.

Lines Analysis: Beijing Temperature Distribution

Here’s what the measurements are telling us. Beijing’s early July climatology shows daily highs typically ranging from 31°C to 38°C, with the mean closer to 33°C to 35°C. The 36°C outcome is plausible and sits near the upper-normal range for this date, which explains why the market assigned it the highest single-outcome probability in the distribution. Weather models for the Beijing region in early July 2026 show a moderately hot pattern, but no strong heat dome or blocking high that would push temperatures to the extreme end of the range.

What makes NO compelling is simple arithmetic. Even if 36°C is the single most likely outcome, it still carries only a 36.5% probability. The remaining probability mass spreads across ten other outcomes. A reading of 35°C or 37°C, each within normal forecast error margins, would resolve this contract NO. Beijing’s diurnal temperature range and the precision required for a single-degree resolution make exact hits statistically challenging regardless of the forecast.

  • China Meteorological Administration publishes official daily maximum temperatures, typically available by early morning UTC on the resolution date.
  • Weather model ensemble spreads for Beijing on July 3 will narrow significantly within 24 to 48 hours of the event, which could shift probability mass toward neighboring degree contracts.
  • A heat surge driven by southwesterly flow from the North China Plain could push the peak toward 38°C or 39°C, collapsing the 36°C contract.
  • A cooler maritime intrusion from the Bohai Sea could drop the peak to 33°C or 34°C, also resolving NO here.
  • The official Beijing Capital Weather Station reading, not airport or suburban sensors, determines resolution.

The data doesn’t care about the politics of weather forecasting. Total volume of $12,034 is modest, and the distribution of probability across eleven outcome contracts means the 36°C slice reflects the market’s best single guess, not a high-confidence signal. The evidence from climatology and current modeling slightly favors outcomes in the 34°C to 37°C band, which is why 36°C earned the lead position. But the NO side captures the math correctly.

LINES VERDICT

NARROW PLURALITY, HIGH UNCERTAINTY

Beijing’s July 3 peak at exactly 36°C is the single most probable outcome in a wide distribution, but a 36.5% probability means the market expects it to miss more often than hit. The structure of multi-outcome temperature contracts makes exact-degree resolution inherently low-probability even when the forecast is well-centered.

What the market says: 36.5% implied probability means traders see this as the likeliest single outcome but still expect a different temperature roughly two-thirds of the time. With resolution in less than 48 hours, any model update or synoptic weather shift could reprice neighboring contracts sharply.

Key unknown: The 24 to 48 hour weather model run from the China Meteorological Administration and global ensemble models will be the decisive input. A tighter forecast cone around 36°C would push this contract higher. A shift toward 37°C or 38°C would drain probability mass from this contract immediately.

Scientific Context: Beijing Summer Temperatures

Beijing sits in a continental monsoon climate. July is statistically the hottest month, with historical daily maxima ranging from the low 30s to above 40°C during extreme heat events. Early July averages cluster around 33°C to 35°C at the Beijing Capital Weather Station. The 36°C threshold sits above the climatological average for July 3 but well within the range of normal variability. No extraordinary forcing mechanism, such as a persistent blocking anticyclone, currently dominates the regional forecast for this specific date. That keeps the probability distribution spread across a wide range of outcomes rather than concentrated at the extremes.

Frequently Asked Questions

It means traders estimate a roughly one-in-three chance Beijing's official high on July 3 lands exactly at 36°C. Most probability is distributed across ten other temperature outcomes from 30°C or below to 40°C or higher.

NO at $0.64 resolves profitably if Beijing's official peak temperature on July 3 is anything other than exactly 36°C. That includes 35°C, 37°C, or any other reading in the distribution.

Updated 24 to 48 hour ensemble weather model runs for Beijing. A tighter forecast centered on 36°C raises the YES price. A shift toward 37°C or 38°C in the models would push probability to neighboring contracts.

The market resolves at 12:00 UTC on July 3, 2026. The official daily maximum temperature from the China Meteorological Administration's Beijing Capital Weather Station determines the outcome.

Liquidity at $60,365 is solid relative to the $12,034 in total volume. Moderate trades will not distort prices sharply, but the low overall volume means this is a thin market. New forecast data could move prices significantly in the final 24 hours.

We aggregate the live positions of the top 50 Polymarket whales (ranked by 30-day tracked volume) into one composite reading per market. It refreshes every hour. The percentage shows how many of those whales hold YES versus NO; the net dollar position shows the cohort's directional exposure in dollars.

A convergence event fires when three or more tracked wallets buy the same outcome on the same market within a four-hour window. We surface these in the activity feed and the VIP digest.

No. Lines is an editorial and data product. We do not operate prediction markets, custody funds, or accept trades. All trade flows deep-link to Polymarket via our affiliate code. Probabilities shown are market-implied and not predictions or recommendations.

What Could Shift These Probabilities?

Forecast Models Converge on 36°C

If the 24 to 48 hour ensemble model runs from major weather centers tighten their forecast cone squarely on 36°C for Beijing on July 3, traders would shift probability mass into this contract. A high-pressure system holding temperatures in the mid-30s without pushing to 37°C or 38°C would be the ideal setup for YES.

Heat Surge Pushes Peak Above 37°C

Southwesterly flow from the North China Plain can rapidly push Beijing highs into the upper 30s during early July. If model guidance shifts the expected peak to 37°C, 38°C, or higher, probability drains quickly from this contract into those neighboring outcomes. A strengthening heat pattern in the 48 hours before resolution is the clearest threat.

Cooler Air Compresses the Distribution

A Bohai Sea maritime influence or cloud cover from the East Asian monsoon trough could suppress Beijing's peak to 33°C or 34°C. That resolves this contract NO, but it also collapses the higher-temperature contracts. The 35°C and 34°C contracts would benefit most. This scenario is a reminder that the 36°C contract can lose from either direction.

Observation Station Discrepancy

Beijing operates multiple weather stations with slightly different microclimatic exposures. If the resolution source specification leads to ambiguity between the Beijing Capital Weather Station and urban monitoring points, final temperature reporting could vary by one degree. That one-degree gap is the entire difference between YES and NO in this market.

Key macro factor: Beijing's 2026 summer has tracked above the 1991 to 2020 climatological baseline, consistent with the broader pattern of elevated Northern Hemisphere land surface temperatures that has characterized the past several years.

Market Timeline

Jul 1, 4:03 AM
Market Created
Jul 1, 4:03 AM
Market Opened
12:00 PM
Market Resolution

Market Comments

Probabilities shown are market-implied and not predictions or recommendations. This content is for informational purposes only.