Close the Ad
Prediction Markets
Back
Accuracy Tracker
World Cup
Crypto
Culture
Economy
Elections
Finance
Politics
Science
Sports
Tech
World
About
Prediction Markets vs. Sportsbooks
Legal Status
Polymarket
Kalshi
Crypto.com
Whales Tracker
Picks
Back
NFL Picks
NBA Picks
MLB Picks
NHL Picks
NCAAB Picks
NCAAF Picks
Sports
Back
NFL
NFL Odds
Props
Parlay
Futures
Teams
Standings
Stats
Schedule
Injuries
Drafts
Super Bowl History
NBA
NBA Odds
Props
Parlays
Futures
Teams
Standings
Stats
Schedule
Injuries
Drafts
NBA History
MLB
MLB Odds
Props
Futures
Teams
Standings
Stats
Schedule
Injuries
Drafts
NHL
NHL Odds
Props
Parlays
Futures
Teams
Standings
Stats
Schedule
Injuries
Drafts
NCAAB
NCAAB Odds
Props
Teams
Standings
Stats
Schedule
March Madness
NCAAF
NCAAF Odds
Props
Futures
Teams
Standings
Stats
Rankings
Schedule
Casinos
Back
Bonuses
Spree
Funrize
Prizepicks
Plusz
Underdog
Chalkboard
Mobile Apps
Sweepstakes
Back
All Reviews
Highest Payout
Fastest Withdrawals
Best 10
Social Casinos
New Casinos
Promo Codes
Deposit with
Paypal
Crypto
Games
Slots
Roulette
By State
Free Spins
Education
How to Redeem Winnings
Instant Withdrawal
Sweeps Coins Guide
Gold Coins Guide
Gold Coins Cost
SC vs GS
Crush Cards
News
NCAAF
Odds
Props
Picks
Futures
Teams
Standings
Stats
Schedule
How To Bet
Home
/
NCAAF Predictions
/
Rutgers Scarlet Knights vs Washington Huskies Predictions
Rutgers Scarlet Knights vs Washington Huskies Predictions
October 10
09:00 PM
(Final)
FS1
Husky Stadium
Rutgers Scarlet Knights
19
38
Washington Huskies
See Full Schedule
MATCHUP PREVIEW
Historically, the Scarlet Knights and Huskies have had a competitive rivalry, with the all-time record leaning slightly in favor of the Huskies. Both teams typically showcase contrasting styles: Rutgers often relies on a strong ground game, while UConn leans towards a more balanced attack. Home field advantage has played a crucial role in this matchup, making the Huskies tough to beat at home, which could influence betting trends moving forward.
POST-GAME
GET EDGE PICKS
Point Spread
Over/Under
Moneyline
Rutgers Scarlet Knights
+10.0
Washington Huskies
-9.5
Final Score
19
–
38
Unlock for as little as $16.65/month
Unlock
Rutgers Scarlet Knights
+10.0
Washington Huskies
-9.5
Final Score
19
–
38
Unlock for as little as $16.65/month
Unlock
Rutgers Scarlet Knights
+10.0
Washington Huskies
-9.5
Final Score
19
–
38
Unlock for as little as $16.65/month
Unlock
RUTGERS SCARLET KNIGHTS VS WASHINGTON HUSKIES MONEYLINE
When the Scarlet Knights and Huskies clash, you’re looking at a matchup that often hinges on style and grit. Rutgers tends to bring a tough, defensive-minded approach, while UConn has historically leaned on a more balanced attack, mixing run and pass effectively. Over the years, the money line has shown a tendency to favor the home team in this series, reflecting how tough it can be for teams to travel and perform in unfamiliar territory, especially in conference play.
See Game Picks
RUTGERS SCARLET KNIGHTS VS WASHINGTON HUSKIES POINT SPREAD
When the Scarlet Knights and Huskies square off, it’s a clash of contrasting styles. Rutgers often brings a gritty, defensive approach, while UConn tends to rely on a more balanced offensive attack. Historically, the point spread has favored the home team in this matchup, reflecting UConn’s ability to capitalize on home-field advantage. Betters should note that the series record leans toward the Huskies, but Rutgers has shown they can keep it competitive, especially when they bring their A-game on defense.
See Game Picks
RUTGERS SCARLET KNIGHTS VS WASHINGTON HUSKIES OVER/UNDER
When the Scarlet Knights and Huskies square off, you’re looking at a clash of styles that really shapes the over/under. Historically, the Huskies like to play a methodical game, leaning on a strong defense that can stifle scoring, especially at home. The Scarlet Knights, meanwhile, have had their moments of offensive explosiveness, but their inconsistency often keeps totals lower. In recent meetings, the under has been a common trend, especially when the game is played in colder conditions, which adds another layer to the matchup dynamics. Overall, expect a battle of wills that often leans toward the under, thanks to the Huskies’ ability to control the pace and the Knights’ tendency to struggle on the road.
See Game Picks
NCAAF Player Props
All Sportsbooks
All Sportsbooks
DraftKings Sportsbook
Wynn Sports Book
BetMGM Sportsbook
FanDuel Sportsbook
BetRivers
Caesars Sportsbook
All Matchups
All Matchups
No props available at this moment
TRENDS
PREVIOUS MATCHUPS
BETTING TRENDS
RUTGER
WASH
0-0
All
0-0
0-0
Home
0-0
0-0
Away
0-0
0-0
as Fav
0-0
0-0
as Dog
0-0
0-0
ATS
0-0
0-0
ATS Home
0-0
0-0
ATS Away
0-0
0-0
O/U
0-0
0-0
O/U Home
0-0
0-0
O/U Away
0-0
RUTGER
vs
WASH
RESULT
LOSE
40-36
OPPONENT
PENNST
Penn State Nittany Lions
DATE
11/29
SPREAD
+13.5
O/U
o54.5
RESULT
LOSE
9-42
OPPONENT
OHIOST
Ohio State Buckeyes
DATE
11/22
SPREAD
+28.5
O/U
u54.5
RESULT
WIN
20-35
OPPONENT
MARY
Maryland Terrapins
DATE
11/08
SPREAD
-2.5
O/U
u56.5
RESULT
LOSE
13-35
OPPONENT
ILL
Illinois Fighting Illini
DATE
11/01
SPREAD
+12.5
O/U
u64.5
RESULT
WIN
27-24
OPPONENT
PUR
Purdue Boilermakers
DATE
10/25
SPREAD
+2.5
O/U
u58.5
RESULT
WIN
10-38
OPPONENT
BOISE
Boise State Broncos
DATE
12/13
SPREAD
—
O/U
u51.5
RESULT
LOSE
26-14
OPPONENT
ORE
Oregon Ducks
DATE
11/29
SPREAD
+6.5
O/U
u50.5
RESULT
WIN
48-14
OPPONENT
UCLA
UCLA Bruins
DATE
11/22
SPREAD
-10.5
O/U
o51.5
RESULT
WIN
13-49
OPPONENT
PUR
Purdue Boilermakers
DATE
11/15
SPREAD
-15.5
O/U
o50.5
RESULT
LOSE
10-13
OPPONENT
WISC
Wisconsin Badgers
DATE
11/08
SPREAD
-10.5
O/U
u44.5
WHO WON
WASH
RESULT
19-38
DATE
10/10
WHO WON
RUTGER
RESULT
18-21
DATE
09/27
BOX SCORE: NCAAF TEAM STATS & PLAYER STATS
PLAYERS
TEAM
RUTGER
WASH
Offense
344
Points
443
3,193
Passing Yards
3,178
5
Interceptions
14
460
Rushing Attempts
454
1,728
Rushing Yards
2,197
0
Fumbles
0
Defense
382
Points Against
243
7
Fumbles Recovered
5
11
Sacks
26
RUTGER
WASH
Passing
C/ATT
YDS
TD
INT
A. Kaliakmanis
QB
229/368
3,124
20
7
A. Surace
QB
4/9
58
2
0
S. Ashenfelder
QB
1/1
11
0
0
Rushing
CAR
YDS
AVG
TD
A. Raymond
RB
244
1,242
5.1
13
A. Kaliakmanis
QB
96
-26
-0.3
4
J. Benjamin
RB
68
328
4.8
2
C. Campbell Jr.
RB
22
118
5.4
0
E. Guerrier
RB
7
25
3.6
0
T. Mitchell
RB
3
14
4.7
0
A. Surace
QB
2
-5
-2.5
0
J. Patel
K
1
-3
-3.0
0
S. Ashenfelder
QB
1
-3
-3.0
0
Receiving
REC
YDS
AVG
TD
K. Duff
WR
60
1,084
18.1
7
D. Sheffield
WR
44
577
13.1
5
K. Fletcher Jr.
TE
26
236
9.1
0
A. Raymond
RB
18
225
12.5
2
C. Weber
TE
17
102
6.0
0
B. Black
WR
8
119
14.9
1
J. Benjamin
RB
4
19
4.8
0
D. Kaliakmanis
WR
1
9
9.0
1
J. Gister
TE
1
11
11.0
0
L. Blake
TE
1
6
6.0
0
M. Thomas III
WR
1
25
25.0
1
V. Allen III
WR
1
18
18.0
0
Defense
TOT
SOLO
SACK
INT
J. Elad
DB
76
48
0
2
D. Djabome
LB
65
32
2
0
K. Sanders
DB
60
39
0
0
A. Wright
LB
55
28
0
0
C. Miller
DB
41
32
1
1
E. O'Neill
DL
36
17
2
0
B. Weaver
DL
31
11
2
0
J. Thompson
DL
25
13
1
0
M. Walker
LB
17
7
0
0
Z. Angoy
DL
15
6
0
0
K. Griffin
DL
11
7
0
0
A. Salaam
DB
10
7
0
0
F. Gnago
DL
9
5
0
1
D. McClary
LB
6
3
0
0
O. Billotte
DL
6
1
0
0
K. Levy
DB
5
3
0
0
T. Ward
DB
5
2
0
0
C. Joines
DB
5
3
0
0
J. Ofurie
DB
5
4
0
0
D. Allen
DL
4
0
0
0
S. Jusma
DB
4
3
0
0
M. Robinson II
DB
3
2
0
0
D. Kaliakmanis
WR
3
2
0
0
K. Archie
LB
3
1
0
0
S. Clawges
DB
2
1
0
0
Z. Williams
DB
2
1
0
0
B. Black
WR
1
1
0
0
C. Weber
TE
1
1
0
0
H. Hughes Jr.
DL
1
0
0
0
I. Crumpler
DB
1
1
0
0
J. Insinga
LB
1
1
0
0
full roster
Passing
C/ATT
YDS
TD
INT
D. Williams Jr.
QB
246/354
3,065
25
8
K. Horton
QB
7/13
98
0
0
D. Boston
WR
2/2
15
1
0
G. Gross
K
0/1
0
0
0
Rushing
CAR
YDS
AVG
TD
J. Coleman
RB
156
758
4.9
15
D. Williams Jr.
QB
143
612
4.3
6
J. Washington
RB
27
233
8.6
1
K. Horton
QB
8
9
1.1
2
R. Moon
RB
5
22
4.4
0
Q. Carr
RB
4
14
3.5
0
D. Roebuck
WR
2
10
5.0
0
O. Evans
WR
1
14
14.0
0
K. Eldridge
TE
1
1
1.0
1
Receiving
REC
YDS
AVG
TD
D. Boston
WR
62
881
14.2
11
D. Roebuck
WR
42
560
13.3
7
D. DeGraaf
TE
32
360
11.2
2
J. Coleman
RB
31
354
11.4
2
O. Evans
WR
17
254
14.9
1
C. Lawson
WR
10
115
11.5
0
Q. Moore
TE
5
83
16.6
1
R. Williams
WR
5
54
10.8
0
J. Williams
WR
2
28
14.0
0
D. Williams Jr.
QB
1
3
3.0
0
K. Eldridge
TE
1
6
6.0
0
Q. Carr
RB
1
5
5.0
0
Defense
TOT
SOLO
SACK
INT
A. McLaughlin
S
91
58
0
2
X. Alexander
LB
66
41
1
1
M. Esteen
S
50
35
0
2
E. Prysock
CB
49
30
0
1
R. Dillard-Allen
S
39
33
0
0
J. Lane
DE
38
21
4
0
Z. Durfee
DE
34
14
4
0
A. Thompson
DL
30
17
1
0
E. Davis
DL
29
20
0
0
J. Manu
LB
22
13
0
0
T. Uiagalelei
DL
21
13
2
0
R. Clark
S
21
14
1
2
T. Davis
CB
20
16
0
2
D. Lynch
DE
18
12
1
1
Z. Rainey-Sale
LB
18
12
1
1
D. Robinson
CB
16
12
1
0
T. Al-Uqdah
LB
14
9
0
0
I. Ward
DE
13
4
2
0
S. Pepa
DL
8
6
0
0
D. Hyde
DE
7
4
1
0
H. Moore
DE
3
2
0
0
D. DeGraaf
TE
2
2
0
0
Q. Moore
TE
2
2
0
0
A. Ward
LB
1
0
0
0
D. Robinson Jr.
LB
1
1
1
0
D. Clemons
CB
1
1
0
0
E. Johnson
CB
1
1
0
0
G. Miller
LB
1
1
0
0
L. Sagapolu
DL
1
1
0
0
M. McCree
OL
1
1
0
0
P. Mencke Jr.
S
1
1
0
0
T. Warner
S
1
1
0
0
full roster
College football is in the off-season
New matchups will appear here as soon as the season returns.