Helo Millions
Home / NCAAF Predictions / North Texas Mean Green vs Navy Midshipmen Predictions

North Texas Mean Green vs Navy Midshipmen Predictions

November 1 12:00 PM (Final)
ESPN2 DATCU Stadium

MATCHUP PREVIEW

The Mean Green and Midshipmen have a competitive history that showcases contrasting styles. Historically, the Midshipmen’s disciplined option offense has often clashed with the Mean Green’s more balanced attack, leading to close games. Home field advantage tends to favor Navy, but the Mean Green’s adaptability can make this matchup unpredictable, which is essential for bettors to consider.
Final Score
17
31

Unlock for as little as $16.65/month

Unlock
Final Score
17
31

Unlock for as little as $16.65/month

Unlock
Final Score
17
31

Unlock for as little as $16.65/month

Unlock

NORTH TEXAS MEAN GREEN VS NAVY MIDSHIPMEN MONEYLINE

When the Mean Green take on the Midshipmen, you’re looking at a clash of styles. North Texas has historically leaned on a high-tempo offense, while Navy brings that triple-option grind, making for a unique chess match. The Midshipmen tend to have the home-field advantage, which often shifts the money line, but the Mean Green can surprise with their aerial attack if they catch Navy off guard.See Game Picks

NORTH TEXAS MEAN GREEN VS NAVY MIDSHIPMEN POINT SPREAD

When the Mean Green and Midshipmen clash, you’re looking at a matchup defined by contrasting styles. The Midshipmen typically bring a disciplined, run-heavy offense that can control the clock, while the Mean Green often rely on a more spread-out, high-tempo approach. Historically, the Midshipmen have had the edge in head-to-head matchups, especially at home, which tends to shift the point spread in their favor. Bettors should note that the travel from Texas to Maryland can impact the Mean Green’s performance, and the Midshipmen’s home field advantage is a factor that can’t be overlooked in the betting line.See Game Picks

NORTH TEXAS MEAN GREEN VS NAVY MIDSHIPMEN OVER/UNDER

When the Mean Green and Midshipmen face off, you’re looking at a classic clash of styles. The Midshipmen’s option offense often slows the game down, which historically leads to lower totals, while the Mean Green’s spread approach can generate big plays that push the score up. Over the years, these matchups have leaned towards the under, especially when played in Annapolis, where the home field tends to favor the Midshipmen’s control of the clock. So, if you’re diving into the over/under for this one, consider how the Midshipmen’s style can stifle scoring, especially in a rivalry where familiarity breeds a tighter contest.See Game Picks
0-0
All
0-0
0-0
Home
0-0
0-0
Away
0-0
0-0
as Fav
0-0
0-0
as Dog
0-0
0-0
ATS
0-0
0-0
ATS Home
0-0
0-0
ATS Away
0-0
0-0
O/U
0-0
0-0
O/U Home
0-0
0-0
O/U Away
0-0
RESULT
WIN 16-17
DATE
12/13
SPREAD
-6.5
O/U
u37.5
RESULT
WIN 28-17
DATE
11/27
SPREAD
+3.5
O/U
u57.5
RESULT
WIN 38-41
DATE
11/15
SPREAD
+8.5
O/U
o62.5
RESULT
LOSE 10-49
DATE
11/08
SPREAD
+30.5
O/U
o54.5
RESULT
LOSE 17-31
DATE
11/01
SPREAD
+6.5
O/U
u66.5
RESULT
WIN 49-47
DATE
12/27
SPREAD
-7.5
O/U
o54.5
RESULT
LOSE 21-34
DATE
12/05
SPREAD
-3.0
O/U
u64.5
RESULT
WIN 25-52
DATE
11/28
SPREAD
-20.5
O/U
o65.5
RESULT
WIN 56-24
DATE
11/22
SPREAD
-18.5
O/U
o57.5
RESULT
WIN 53-24
DATE
11/15
SPREAD
-17.5
O/U
o67.5
WHO WON
Mean Green logo NTX
RESULT
17-31
DATE
11/01
WHO WON
Midshipmen logo NAVY
RESULT
24-27
DATE
10/07

BOX SCORE: NCAAF TEAM STATS & PLAYER STATS

Offense
374
Points
631
1,582
Passing Yards
4,442
6
Interceptions
15
575
Rushing Attempts
504
3,515
Rushing Yards
2,739
0
Fumbles
0
Defense
312
Points Against
371
7
Fumbles Recovered
13
26
Sacks
24
Passing
C/ATT
YDS
TD
INT
88/144
1,472
10
6
9/19
110
0
0
Rushing
CAR
YDS
AVG
TD
208
1,147
5.5
15
142
822
5.8
9
67
437
6.5
3
55
415
7.5
3
43
414
9.6
6
26
156
6.0
0
14
41
2.9
1
9
30
3.3
0
3
17
5.7
0
2
9
4.5
1
2
12
6.0
0
1
11
11.0
0
Receiving
REC
YDS
AVG
TD
46
877
19.1
5
16
158
9.9
0
12
123
10.2
1
4
128
32.0
1
4
104
26.0
2
4
68
17.0
0
3
60
20.0
0
1
10
10.0
0
1
10
10.0
0
1
23
23.0
0
1
3
3.0
0
1
3
3.0
1
Defense
TOT
SOLO
SACK
INT
90
43
2
1
76
45
0
0
70
27
3
0
68
28
0
1
43
15
3
0
34
12
4
0
28
9
4
0
27
13
0
0
24
14
0
0
13
10
0
0
12
6
0
0
6
4
0
0
5
2
0
0
4
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
full roster
Passing
C/ATT
YDS
TD
INT
Rushing
CAR
YDS
AVG
TD
75
389
5.2
5
45
274
6.1
5
21
87
4.1
2
2
22
11.0
1
1
2
2.0
0
Receiving
REC
YDS
AVG
TD
55
886
16.1
8
47
550
11.7
2
30
375
12.5
5
16
136
8.5
0
7
80
11.4
0
3
34
11.3
0
3
17
5.7
0
3
20
6.7
0
2
12
6.0
0
2
17
8.5
0
1
-2
-2.0
0
Defense
TOT
SOLO
SACK
INT
99
50
1
1
74
43
0
3
56
30
0
1
49
34
0
1
31
16
1
0
18
11
0
0
17
13
1
0
12
7
2
0
3
1
0
0
2
1
0
0
2
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
full roster