Helo Millions
Home / NCAAB Predictions / Princeton Tigers vs Penn Quakers Predictions

Princeton Tigers vs Penn Quakers Predictions

February 7 02:00 PM (Final)
ESPNU The Palestra
Princeton Tigers
 60 61
Penn Quakers
See Full Schedule

MATCHUP PREVIEW

Historically, the Tigers and Quakers have faced off in a rivalry marked by contrasting styles. The Tigers often rely on a fast-paced, aggressive approach, while the Quakers emphasize disciplined defense and strategic play. This matchup tends to favor the home team, with the Quakers holding a slight edge in their all-time series record, making home court advantage a critical factor to consider for bettors.
POST-GAME GET EDGE PICKS
Princeton Tigers
sportsbook icon
+3.5
Penn Quakers
sportsbook icon
-3.5
Final Score
60
–
61
Confidence Level: 70%

Unlock for as little as $16.65/month

Unlock
Play Now with Best Odds
New Player Offer $500 Risk Free Bet
$187
Payout BONUS
 SIGNUP
Up to $1,000
Claim Now
Princeton Tigers
sportsbook icon
+3.5
Penn Quakers
sportsbook icon
-3.5
Final Score
60
–
61
Confidence Level: 58.7%

Unlock for as little as $16.65/month

Unlock
Play Now with Best Odds
New Player Offer $500 Risk Free Bet
$187
Payout BONUS
 SIGNUP
Up to $1,000
Claim Now
Princeton Tigers
sportsbook icon
+3.5
Penn Quakers
sportsbook icon
-3.5
Final Score
60
–
61
Confidence Level: 72.1%

Unlock for as little as $16.65/month

Unlock
Play Now with Best Odds
New Player Offer $500 Risk Free Bet
$240
Payout BONUS
 SIGNUP
Up to $1,000
Claim Now

PRINCETON TIGERS VS PENN QUAKERS MONEYLINE

When the Tigers and Quakers meet, you’re looking at a clash of styles that goes beyond just the scoreboard. The Tigers often lean on their athleticism and pressure defense, while the Quakers pride themselves on a disciplined, methodical approach. Historically, home court has been a strong advantage for the Quakers, but the Tigers have shown they can pull off upsets, especially when the money line shifts in their favor, reflecting the betting public’s respect for their talent.See Game Picks

PRINCETON TIGERS VS PENN QUAKERS POINT SPREAD

When the Tigers and Quakers face off, you’re looking at a classic clash of styles. The Tigers typically rely on their athleticism and fast-paced play, while the Quakers tend to grind it out with disciplined execution and strong defense. Historically, this matchup leans towards tight spreads, especially when played in Philadelphia, where the Quakers’ home court can sway the outcome. Bettors should keep an eye on how the Tigers’ ability to push the tempo can disrupt the Quakers’ rhythm, but also remember that the Quakers’ experience in close games often gives them an edge in the final minutes.See Game Picks

PRINCETON TIGERS VS PENN QUAKERS OVER/UNDER

When the Tigers and Quakers face off, you’re looking at a matchup with a history of tight games and contrasting styles. The Tigers often push the pace, looking to score quickly, while the Quakers prefer a more methodical approach, focusing on defense and slowing things down. Historically, this has led to a mixed bag for totals; when the Tigers are on the road, games tend to trend under due to the Quakers’ home court advantage and ability to control the tempo, but when they meet in a higher-scoring affair, it’s usually because the Tigers found a way to dictate the pace. Overall, understanding these teams’ identities and how they clash is key to reading the over/under trends in their matchups.See Game Picks

TRENDS

PRNCE Logo  PRNCE PENN Logo  PENN
0-0
All
0-0
0-0
Home
0-0
0-0
Away
0-0
0-0
as Fav
0-0
0-0
as Dog
0-0
0-0
ATS
0-0
0-0
ATS Home
0-0
0-0
ATS Away
0-0
0-0
O/U
0-0
0-0
O/U Home
0-0
0-0
O/U Away
0-0
RESULT
LOSE 53-78
OPPONENT
Bulldogs logo YALE Yale Bulldogs
DATE
03/07
SPREAD
+14.5
O/U
u138.5
RESULT
WIN 61-82
OPPONENT
Big Green logo DART Dartmouth Big Green
DATE
02/28
SPREAD
—
O/U
u155.5
RESULT
LOSE 58-56
OPPONENT
Crimson logo HARVRD Harvard Crimson
DATE
02/27
SPREAD
+3.5
O/U
u130.0
RESULT
LOSE 71-80
OPPONENT
Bears logo BROWN Brown Bears
DATE
02/20
SPREAD
+1.5
O/U
o128.5
RESULT
LOSE 75-65
OPPONENT
Lions logo COLMB Columbia Lions
DATE
02/14
SPREAD
+0.0
O/U
o139.0
RESULT
LOSE 70-105
OPPONENT
Fighting Illini logo ILL Illinois Fighting Illini
DATE
03/19
SPREAD
+21.5
O/U
o149.5
RESULT
WIN 88-84
OPPONENT
Bulldogs logo YALE Yale Bulldogs
DATE
03/15
SPREAD
+9.5
O/U
o142.5
RESULT
WIN 62-60
OPPONENT
Crimson logo HARVRD Harvard Crimson
DATE
03/14
SPREAD
+2.5
O/U
u135.5
RESULT
WIN 82-61
OPPONENT
Bears logo BROWN Brown Bears
DATE
03/06
SPREAD
-2.5
O/U
o141.5
RESULT
WIN 61-64
OPPONENT
Crimson logo HARVRD Harvard Crimson
DATE
02/28
SPREAD
-1.5
O/U
u138.5
WHO WON
Quakers logo PENN
RESULT
60-61
DATE
02/07
WHO WON
Tigers logo PRNCE
RESULT
76-78
DATE
01/05
WHO WON
Tigers logo PRNCE
RESULT
71-95
DATE
03/08
WHO WON
Tigers logo PRNCE
RESULT
61-59
DATE
02/07
WHO WON
Tigers logo PRNCE
RESULT
105-83
DATE
03/09

BOX SCORE: NCAAB TEAM STATS & PLAYER STATS

PRNCE Logo PRNCE PENN Logo PENN
2.4
Points Per Game
2.6
1.5
Field Goal Percentage
1.5
1.7
2-Point Field Goal Percentage
1.6
1.2
3-Point Field Goal Percentage
1.3
2.6
Free Throw Percentage
2.4
9.4
Offensive Rebounds Per Game
11.5
23.9
Defensive Rebounds Per Game
24.9
12
Assists
13
0.1
Blocked Shots Per Game
0.1
10.7
Turnovers Per Game
10.6
STARTERS
MIN
REB
AST
PTS
L. Clark G
837:00
116.00
53.00
174.00
D. Davis G
425:00
31.00
25.00
188.00
J. Stanton G
205:00
21.00
6.00
67.00
P. Seals G
171:00
24.00
17.00
69.00
J. Sussberg G
128:00
21.00
3.00
43.00
J. Hicke G
112:00
24.00
11.00
18.00
B. Peters G
64:00
12.00
4.00
18.00
D. Gakwasi G
53:00
9.00
7.00
22.00
R. Duncan G
27:00
1.00
1.00
9.00
Z. Kim G
18:00
3.00
1.00
4.00
R. Mandes G
10:00
2.00
0.00
2.00
C. Mueller G
9:00
5.00
0.00
4.00
L. Denault G
1:00
0.00
0.00
0.00
M. Abdullahi F
391:00
72.00
9.00
116.00
S. Whitfield G-F
362:00
55.00
15.00
98.00
C. Happy F
266:00
51.00
13.00
124.00
J. Hammond F
167:00
27.00
5.00
54.00
J. Huggins F
131:00
31.00
4.00
33.00
C. McSweeney F
79:00
14.00
13.00
11.00
P. Byriel F
29:00
10.00
1.00
15.00
W. Kutzler F
6:00
1.00
1.00
0.00
full roster
STARTERS
MIN
REB
AST
PTS
A. Levine G
513:00
62.00
50.00
96.00
G. Smith G
500:00
64.00
24.00
133.00
J. Jones G
362:00
61.00
31.00
102.00
N. Polonowski G-F
149:00
16.00
5.00
77.00
R. McMullen G
111:00
8.00
6.00
23.00
C. Thrower G
94:00
10.00
6.00
34.00
A. Massung G
52:00
6.00
5.00
15.00
L. Lueth F
447:00
83.00
16.00
85.00
A. Gerhart F
175:00
32.00
16.00
46.00
P. Kamin G-F
15:00
1.00
1.00
4.00
W. Kruse F
7:00
5.00
0.00
5.00
D. Scantlebury F-C
438:00
111.00
16.00
167.00
C. Ubochi C
0:00
0.00
0.00
0.00
full roster

Affiliate Disclosure: Lines may receive advertising commissions for visits to a sportsbook or betting site. 

All content, materials, programs, services, and software contained on or made available by this site are for entertainment, educational, and informational purposes only. Any use of the foregoing in violation of local, state, federal, provincial, or national law is strictly prohibited. Lines.com does not warrant the legality of any particular gambling activities in any user’s specific location. Laws and regulations change continually worldwide, and it is the visitor’s responsibility to ensure that any gambling actions or behaviors they undertake are legal in their relevant jurisdiction.

College basketball is in the off-seasonNew matchups will appear here as soon as the season returns.