Will the Stop Nick Shirley Act Become California Law by June 30?

The clock is the story here. Assembly Bill 2624, nicknamed the “Stop Nick Shirley Act” by Republican critics, passed the California Assembly on May 26 by a 57-19 vote. Now it needs a Senate floor vote and Governor Gavin Newsom’s signature, all before June 30. The market has looked at that timeline and rendered its verdict: the odds sit at roughly 5 percent.

The market question is whether the California “Stop Nick Shirley Act” becomes law by June 30, 2026. YES contracts trade at $0.05 and NO contracts trade at $0.95. Total market volume is $543, with no activity recorded in the past 24 hours.

How AB 2624 Resolves

YES pays out if AB 2624, formally titled “Privacy for Immigration Support Services Providers,” is signed into law by June 30, 2026. That requires the California Senate to pass the bill and Newsom to sign it before the deadline. NO pays out if any step fails, including Senate inaction, a failed floor vote, or a Newsom veto or pocket veto.

• YES ($0.05): AB 2624 clears the Senate and receives Newsom’s signature before July 1.
• NO ($0.95): The Senate delays, votes it down, or Newsom declines to sign within the window.

The NO position reflects a simple structural reality. The California Senate operates on its own calendar. Bills routinely sit in committee for weeks after arriving from the Assembly. Assembymember Mia Bonta authored the bill, but Bonta does not control the Senate’s scheduling. Any delay kills the YES outcome without a single vote against the bill on the merits.

Market Signals: Thin Volume, Steady Conviction

Sponsored Partner

Market Signals: Thin Volume, Steady Conviction

Momentum here is nearly flat with a mild uptick. The 1-hour change sits at -0.1 percent, the 24-hour change at +0.4 percent, and the trend score at 8.13. That combination signals a market that has stabilized near its floor, not one seeing fresh buying pressure. The Assembly passage on May 26 did not move the needle meaningfully, which tells you traders already understood the Senate bottleneck before that vote.

Total volume stands at $543, with $96 in liquidity and zero dollars traded in the past 24 hours. Those numbers confirm this is a low-conviction, low-traffic market. The wide NO-side consensus is durable, not contested. No large trades are present to suggest any player sees mispriced risk on either side.

• AB 2624 passed the California Assembly 57-19 on May 26, 2026, and now awaits Senate action.
• The 24-hour price change of +0.4 percent is the only upward signal, offset by a -0.1 percent hourly drift.
• Trend score of 8.13 with near-zero volume indicates price stability, not a momentum shift.
• $543 total volume and $96 liquidity reflect a market with limited trader engagement and high NO-side confidence.
• Zero 24-hour volume means no new information is moving this contract today.

Lines Analysis: AB 2624 and the Senate Clock

The NO side carries the structural weight here. The math doesn’t lie: California’s Senate calendar is the single biggest obstacle. Even bills with bipartisan momentum can languish in committee for weeks. AB 2624 arrived in the Senate with less than five weeks until the June 30 deadline. The Senate typically refers bills to multiple committees before scheduling a floor vote. A single committee delay wipes out the YES outcome entirely.

The YES outcome is still alive if the Senate fast-tracks the bill. Democratic leadership controls the Senate calendar. If Newsom signals he wants this signed quickly, leadership can expedite committee hearings and a floor vote. The bill already cleared the Assembly with Democratic votes to spare. That same coalition exists in the Senate. The question is whether anyone is willing to burn political capital rushing a controversial privacy bill before summer recess pressures mount.

• Senate scheduling is the decisive variable: any committee delay past mid-June kills YES mechanically.
• Newsom’s position on AB 2624 would move this market sharply: a public endorsement signals expedited action.
• Republican opposition, led by Assemblymember Carl DeMaio, keeps pressure on Senate Democrats to slow-walk the bill.
• A Senate committee vote reported before June 20 would push YES above 20 percent.
• Newsom facing any political incentive to distance himself from the bill would collapse YES toward 2 percent.

The $543 total volume reflects a market where most traders settled this question early and stopped watching. The data favors NO by an overwhelming margin. The only scenario where YES wins is aggressive Democratic Senate leadership moving faster than the California legislature’s historical pace.

LINES VERDICT

No: Senate Timeline Makes June Thirty Deadline Prohibitive

The California Senate has too many procedural steps and too little time for AB 2624 to become law before June 30. Unless leadership fast-tracks the bill with unusual urgency, the deadline expires before the process concludes.

What the market says: At roughly 5 percent implied probability, the market has priced this as a near-certain NO outcome, with the only remaining question being whether a Senate sprint changes the math before June 30.

Political Context

AB 2624 sits at the intersection of immigration policy and press freedom. Assemblymember Mia Bonta of Oakland framed it as protection for immigration service providers facing harassment. Carl DeMaio named it after YouTuber Nick Shirley, who documented alleged fraud at government-funded nonprofits in Minnesota. Shirley’s work drew national attention and made this bill a lightning rod well beyond Sacramento. Senate leadership’s willingness to prioritize AB 2624 before June 30 is the only real question left.

A Senate committee vote before June 20 is the clearest YES-side catalyst. A Newsom statement opposing the bill, or Senate pressure to hold it until fall, confirms NO and locks price at current levels.

Will the Stop Nick Shirley Act become California law by June 30?

Prediction markets assign roughly 5 percent probability, meaning traders expect this to fail on timing even if the bill ultimately becomes law later in the year.

What does the NO contract pay out on?

The NO contract pays if AB 2624 is not signed into California law before July 1, 2026, whether because the Senate delays, votes against it, or Newsom declines to sign.

What moves this contract’s price?

Senate scheduling news is the primary catalyst. A committee hearing date, a floor vote date, or a Newsom statement on the bill would shift YES price significantly.

When does this market resolve?

Resolution is June 30, 2026. Any legislative action after that date does not affect this contract, even if AB 2624 eventually becomes law.

Is $543 in total volume enough to trust this market?

Low volume markets reflect consensus, not deep liquidity. The 95 percent NO price here aligns with the structural timeline problem, making the signal directionally reliable even if the market is thinly traded.