Guardians vs. White Sox Best Run Line 5/9/24
Cleveland Guardians vs. Chicago White Sox Game Pick
The Cleveland Guardians take on the Chicago White Sox at Guaranteed Rate Field on Thursday, May 9th, at 7:40 PM EDT
Cleveland Guardians vs. Chicago White Sox Odds
Moneyline: Guardians -145 (Caesars Casino), White Sox +132 (FanDuel)
Run Line: Guardians -1.5 (+115 Caesars Casino), White Sox +1.5 (-130 BetMGM)
Total: Over 8.0 (-115 Caesars Casino), Under 8.5 (-115 BetRivers)
Starting Pitchers
Guardians: Ben Lively (2.08 ERA; 1.01 WHIP)
White Sox: Erick Fedde (3.46 ERA; 1.18 WHIP)
Betting Trends
Record: Cleveland Guardians: 76-86 Chicago White Sox: 61-101
ATS: Cleveland Guardians: 76-86 Chicago White Sox: 61-101
Over/Under: Cleveland Guardians: 79-74-9 Chicago White Sox: 79-74-9
Matchup Preview
The Guardians will face off against the White Sox in an MLB matchup. The Guardians have a strong lineup led by Josh Naylor, José Ramírez, and Steven Kwan. Naylor boasts a .308 AVG and 17 HR, while Ramírez has a .282 AVG and 24 HR. Kwan, although injured, has contributed with a .268 AVG and 5 HR. On the other side, the White Sox will rely on Eloy Jiménez and Andrew Benintendi. Jiménez has a .272 AVG and 18 HR, while Benintendi has a .262 AVG and 5 HR. With both teams having key players and injuries to consider, it will be an intriguing matchup.
Run line pick: Guardians
Affiliate Disclosure: Lines may receive advertising commissions for visits to a sportsbook or betting site.
All content, materials, programs, services, and software contained on or made available by this site are for entertainment, educational, and informational purposes only. Any use of the foregoing in violation of local, state, federal, provincial, or national law is strictly prohibited. Lines.com does not warrant the legality of any particular gambling activities in any user’s specific location. Laws and regulations change continually worldwide, and it is the visitor’s responsibility to ensure that any gambling actions or behaviors they undertake are legal in their relevant jurisdiction.